Finding Consistency: Arizona Case Provides Good Example Of Prior Consistent Statement Rule September 17, 2009
My New Essay: Crossing Over: Why Attorneys (And Judges) Should Not Be Able To Cross-Examine Witnesses Regarding Their Immigration Statuses For Impeachment Purposes September 16, 2009
Rape Shield Redux: Supreme Court Of Nevada Finds Rule 26 Applies Where Rape Shield Law Doesn’t September 15, 2009
Requiem For Residuum: Court Of Appeals Of Utah Finds Ruling Against Nurse Didn’t Violate Residuum Rule September 14, 2009
The Sleeping Juror: Eastern District Of California Denies Habeas Relief To Petitioner Despite Non-Juror Evidence Of Sleeping Juror September 13, 2009
Make Me Whole: Supreme Court Of Minnesota Opinion Reveals Odd “Whole Person” Analysis Under Felony Impeachment Rule September 12, 2009
Identity: Court Of Appeals Of Texas, San Antonio, Finds Rule 803(4) Covers Statements Of Identification By Child Declarants September 11, 2009
The Myth Of Fingerprints, Take 4: Federal Judge Finds Fingerprint Evidence Admissible In Brian Keith Rose Murder Trial September 10, 2009
